Jump directly to main navigation Jump directly to content

Decentralised water reuse as a building block of municipal resilience

Critical water infrastructure: Why resilience must be considered now!

Municipal drinking water supply and wastewater disposal are part of the critical infrastructure: they ensure basic services of general interest and must function reliably even in the event of disruptions. (1) In the CRITIS water sector, this includes drinking water supply (extraction, treatment, distribution) as well as wastewater disposal, wastewater treatment, urban drainage and the control and monitoring of these systems. (2)

At the same time, physical and digital risks are becoming more of a focus. The EU has defined minimum requirements and supervision to strengthen the resilience of critical facilities; in Germany, the protection of critical infrastructure is also being further tightened. (3) (4)

In the energy supply sector, resilience has been a guiding principle for years (redundancy, island operation, decentralised feeders). The same principle applies to the water industry: the greater the dependency on a few centralised nodes, the greater the system vulnerability - and the more important it is to have supplements that distribute loads and create local reserves.

Centralised vs. decentralised: Competition in the fee logic - supplementation in the system logic

Decentralised rainwater harvesting and water reuse have long been perceived primarily as competition for central infrastructure: When building owners draw less drinking water and discharge less wastewater, volumes fall - while networks, systems and personnel are predominantly driven by fixed costs. This can lead to tensions in municipal fee and charge structures because falling volumes do not automatically mean falling costs. As with electricity grids, it is helpful to consider not only the "volume sold", but also the system services provided: Relief during peaks, additional reserve, damage avoidance and postponement of expansion investments. In the system logic, however, decentralised solutions are not a "replacement" for services of general interest, but an additional service component:

  • Centralised: high quality assurance, economies of scale, uniform operational management, supply for all
  • Decentralised: local buffer storage, reduction of peak loads, additional water source for defined uses (e.g. WC, irrigation, cleaning)

Security and crisis-related: Decentralised systems as redundancy against failures

The security situation in Europe - including the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine - has significantly accelerated the discussion about the protection and functionality of critical infrastructures. (5) For local authorities, this means that in addition to climate adaptation and economic efficiency, the question of how quickly supply and disposal can be stabilised after disruptions - and the extent to which individual failures have an impact - is becoming increasingly important. Decentralised systems contribute to this if they are correctly integrated in terms of planning and operation. They do not replace municipal responsibility for security of supply, but expand the range of instruments - similar to emergency power, redundant pumping stations or additional storage volumes:

  • Risk diversification: Several local units reduce dependence on individual centralised components.
  • Emergency operation capability for partial functions: Non-drinking water-related applications can be backed up locally (e.g. process water, irrigation, toilet flushing).

Operational transparency: Measuring and monitoring concepts support safe operation - especially where water quality and hygiene requirements must be met.

Rainwater management and sponge city: relief instead of expansion

In addition to the safety aspect, heavy rainfall, overloading of drainage systems and urban heat remain risks at municipal level. Decentralised rainwater management (retention, infiltration, use) works where the pollution occurs - on the property and in the neighbourhood.
Sponge city approaches aim to retain, evaporate and infiltrate rainwater in a targeted manner; this can reduce runoff peaks, reduce substance inputs and support groundwater recharge - and at the same time contribute to cooling the urban climate through additional evaporation. (6) Traditional network expansion (larger channels, retention basins) solves symptoms "downstream". Decentralised measures start "upstream" and can - depending on the local situation - postpone, reduce or target the expansion. In many municipalities, this results in a practicable combination: central infrastructure remains the backbone, decentralised measures are systematically implemented as a second level.

From competition to cooperation: implementation models for municipalities

Clear roles and reliable operating models are required for decentralised solutions to become viable at a municipal level. Neighbourhood solutions have proved particularly successful:

  1. Neighbourhood solutions instead of individual systems (scaling, standardised operation)
  2. Operator/contracting models (maintenance, monitoring, responsibilities regulated)
  3. Incentive systems in the rainwater sector (e.g. via retention or runoff effect) - always within the framework of local bylaws and fee calculation
  4. Pilot programmes with measurable targets (relief effect, volume, operating experience)

Decentralised water reuse and rainwater management are therefore not a counter-design to municipal infrastructure, but a necessary, resilience-oriented addition - technically, organisationally and increasingly also strategically. The Aachen-based research and development alliance AIX-Net-WWR is an example of an integrative overall solution (7).

Bibliography

1 Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution. Critical infrastructures (KRITIS). [Online] 2026. [Quote from: 5 January 2026.] www.verfassungsschutz.de/SharedDocs/glossareintraege/DE/K/kritische-infrastrukturen-kritis.html.

2 Federal Office for Information Security. KRITIS sector water. [Online] [Citation from: 5 January 2026.] www.bsi.bund.de/dok/sektor-wasser.

3 European Union.Directive (EU) 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on the resilience of critical facilities and repealing Council Directive 2008/114/EC. data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2557/oj: European Parliament and European Council, 2022.

4 DVGW. Protection of Critical Infrastructure Remains an Important Task of Water Supply in Germany. [Online] 17 September 2024. [Quote from: 5 January 2026.] www.dvgw.de/der-dvgw/aktuelles/presse/presseinformationen/dvgw-presseinformation-vom-17092024-schutz-kritische-infrastruktur-wasserversorgung.

5 Wacket, Marcus. Germany approves new rules to protect critical infrastructure. [Online] Reuters, 10 September 2025. [Quoted from: 5 January 2026.] www.reuters.com/sustainability/land-use-biodiversity/germany-approves-new-rules-protect-critical-infrastructure-2025-09-10/.

6 Young DWA. Infostainable #2 Topic: Sponge city. Circle for Sustainable Water Management of the JDWA.

7. AIX-Net-WWR. [Online] www.aix-net-wwr.com/de/home.